Issued Friday March 27, 2015
Wednesday April 01, 2015
|2 CA-CV 2014-0095||Dept. B||2:00pm||In Court||Gila||Peter J. Cahill|
|PAYSON WATER COMPANY v. PRAHIN|
1. Did the parties’ stipulation to dismiss remaining claims without prejudice subject to an agreement to privately arbitrate the dismissed claims render the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment a final, appealable order?
2. Did the trial court err in determining that Payson Water Co. owned the well and well facilities as a matter of law?
3. Did the parties’ mutual departures from the main extension agreement render it a nullity?
4. Did the trial court err by determining Prahin’s remaining claims were barred by the statute of limitations?
Wednesday April 15, 2015
|2 CA-CR 2014-0169||Dept. B||2:00 p.m.||Cochise||Karl D. Elledge|
|STATE OF ARIZONA v. FRANCISCO L. ENCINAS VALENZUELA|
|2 CA-CV 2014-0134||Dept. B||3:00pm||In Court||Pima||Dean Christoffel|
|VALER C. AUSTIN v. JOSIAH T. AUSTIN|
|2 CA-CV 2014-0044||Dept. A||9:00am||In Court||Pima||Carmine Cornelio|
|CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SOUTH, LLC v. FALCONE BROTHERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.|
|Issue Summary: To preserve its claim against a bond on a public works project, may a materialman claimant send the twenty day notices required by Arizona’s “Little Miller Act,” A.R.S. § 34-223(A), via first class mail with certificates of mailing, rather than by registered or certified mail?|
Wednesday May 13, 2015
|2 CA-CV 2014-0069||Dept. A||2:00pm||In Court||Pima||Jeffrey T. Bergin|
|ROLLINGS, TRUSTEE OF THE ROLLINGS TRUST v. CITY OF TUCSON|