Wednesday June 05, 2013
| 2 CA-CR 2012-0155 | Dept. B | 2:00pm | In Court | Pima | Christopher C. Browning | |
| STATE OF ARIZONA v. MARTIN DAVID SALAZAR-MERCADO | ||||||
| Issue Summary: Does Rule 702, Ariz. R. Evid., require the per se preclusion of an expert witness who intends to provide general testimony without applying her principles and methods to the facts of the case? Did the trial court err in admitting a victim’s prior inconsistent statement to a police detective as substantive evidence? | ||||||
Wednesday July 10, 2013
| 2 CA-CV 2012-0063 - 2 CA-CV 2012-0157 (consolidated) | Dept. A | 2:00 | Pima | Ted B. Borek | ||
| COHEN v. LOVITT & TOUCHE, INC. | ||||||
| Issue Summary: | ||||||